e3.MUST WATCH: CNN Calls Out Hakeem Jeffries to His Face

MUST WATCH: CNN Calls Out Hakeem Jeffries to His Face

CNN’s “Inside Politics,” host Dana Bash pushed House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries aggressively on the ongoing government shutdown and questioned his party’s role in resolving the impasse.

Bash repeatedly challenged Jeffries’s narrative that Democrats were ready to negotiate, suggesting instead that the real paralysis lay within Democratic leadership’s own demands.

At one point, Bash pressed Jeffries: “You say you want to talk, but Speaker Johnson apparently hasn’t been given permission to meet with you — have you tried knocking on his door, walking down the hall?”

Jeffries responded that Republicans had cut off communication, arguing that informal meetings would not be fruitful without willingness on the part of congressional leadership.

But Bash would not let the exchange end there.

She pressed whether the Democratic proposal — which included extending Affordable Care Act subsidies and reversing GOP healthcare cuts — was negotiable, or whether it was a nonstarter.

Jeffries maintained that Democrats remained open to bipartisan solutions but insisted Republicans had gone “radio silent.”

The tension escalated when Bash framed a question in a blunt, almost confrontational tone: “You could probably take a few steps… have you tried that?”

At several junctures, Bash’s questioning seemed designed to corner Jeffries into accountability, undermining his attempt to shift blame entirely to Republicans.

She also raised the inconsistency of Jeffries’s position, pointing out that what he called “negotiable” may not actually be open to compromise if Democrats hold firm on all their demands.

Jeffries attempted to shift the blame back, saying Republicans had repeatedly tried to repeal the ACA and were unwilling to extend subsidies without structural changes.

Bash followed up by asking whether he would support a one-year extension of those subsidies if Republicans would allow it.

Jeffries demurred, saying he was not ready to accept that narrow fix without broader action.

Through the interview, Bash adopted a skeptical posture toward Jeffries’s narrative — something that conservatives seized on as evidence that even legacy media are now pushing back harder on Democratic talking points.

Conservatives applauded Bash’s refusal to act as a passive conduit for official messaging. One commentator called the moment a turning point in media deference.

Social media users echoed the sentiment: “Even leftist CNN’s Bash shuts down Jeffries’ shutdown whine — caught off guard with brutal challenge.”

The exchange also undercut Jeffries’s argument that Democrats were trying to negotiate in good faith.

Bash sought to expose whether those overtures were real or rhetorical cover.

From a conservative vantage, this marked a welcome line of questioning from mainstream media — one that forces Democratic leaders to defend their posture rather than allowing them to dominate the narrative unchallenged.

The interview ended without a clear breakthrough, but the dynamic was telling: more pressure on Jeffries, less room for him to stick to the standard talking points.

In the coming days, this exchange may be referenced by Republicans as evidence that Democratic leaders aren’t being upfront about what they’re willing or unwilling to give up in negotiations.

BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…

Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.

Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.

She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.

“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”

These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.

Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.

The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.

“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”

Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.

For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.

Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.

What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.

In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.

Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.

Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.

Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.

This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.

Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.

The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.

BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…

Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.

Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.

“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.

The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.

According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.

Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.

“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.

Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.

AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”

Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.

“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.

Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.

Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.

House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.

“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.

Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.

But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.

“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.

Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.

“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.

Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.

Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.

Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.

“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”

JD VANCE LAUNCHES NATIONWIDE INVESTIGATION INTO VOTER FRAUD psss

JD VANCE LAUNCHES NATIONWIDE INVESTIGATION INTO VOTER FRAUD

JD VANCE LAUNCHES NATIONWIDE INVESTIGATION INTO VOTER FRAUD — AND POINTS THE FINGER THAT STUNNED AMERICA

The Capitol chamber was silent when it happened. The tension in the room was heavy, the kind that only comes before a political earthquake. Vice President JD Vance, known for his calm but unflinching demeanor, had just announced what could become the largest election integrity investigation in U.S. history. The subject: alleged voter fraud in the New York City mayoral race.

e14.James Facing Up To 60 Years In Prison In Mortgage Fraud Case

New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted on federal bank fraud charges after prosecutors alleged she lied on a mortgage application to obtain favorable loan terms on a Virginia property she later rented out.

The indictment, returned by a federal grand jury, centers on a single-family home in Norfolk, Virginia, that James co-purchased in August 2020 for roughly $137,000. Most of the purchase was financed with a $109,600 loan that prohibited the home from being used as a rental or investment property, according to prosecutors.

 

By misrepresenting the property as a second home, James received a lower interest rate and saved “approximately $18,933 over the life of the loan,” prosecutors said in a five-page filing.

Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte referred the case to the Department of Justice earlier this year, prompting a criminal probe that led to Thursday’s indictment.

According to financial disclosure forms reviewed by the 

 

New York Post, James repeatedly listed the Norfolk property as an “investment” from 2020 through 2023 in filings with the New York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government. In 2024, she changed the classification to “real property,” just weeks after the FHFA referral was made.

“The indicted attorney general also estimated the value of the property anywhere between $150,000 and $200,000,” the Post reported.

Despite the loan’s clear prohibition against rental use, prosecutors allege James used the property as a rental investment and earned thousands of dollars in income that she failed to report on multiple disclosure forms.

 

In her 2020 disclosure, James did list an “investment real property” in Norfolk that generated between $1,000 and $5,000 in revenue, but it is unclear if that referred to the same home named in the indictment.

 

According to prosecutors, James agreed to a “Second Home Rider” when taking out the loan, which required her to occupy the home as her secondary residence and forbade any rental or shared ownership arrangement.

“Despite these representations,” the indictment reads, “the Norfolk property was not occupied or used by James as a secondary residence and was instead used as a rental investment property.”

Prosecutors also said James made false statements on her homeowners’ insurance application, claiming the home would be “owner occupied,” and on her federal tax filings, where she classified the house as “rental real estate” and reported “thousand(s) of dollars in rents received.”

 

The federal indictment charges James with two counts: bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. If convicted on both counts, she faces up to 60 years in prison and fines totaling as much as $2 million.

 

The judge presiding over James’ mortgage fraud case on Friday rejected a motion seeking to compel federal prosecutors to maintain a log of all their communications with the media.

Defense attorney Abbe Lowell had filed the request last week, following James’ arraignment on charges of bank fraud and making false statements. The motion cited a report alleging that U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan exchanged a series of encrypted Signal messages with a reporter regarding the case, 

 

the New York Post reported.

“[T]he defendant does not demonstrate that it is necessary for the Court to order the government to track communications with the media in any particular form,” wrote US District Judge Jamar Walker in his six-page order.

 

“The defendant’s request that the government be required to keep a communication log is DENIED,” the Biden-appointed judge ruled.

Walker further wrote that while Halligan’s Signal chat with Lawfare senior editor Anna Bower earlier this month was “unusual,” he nevertheless declined to offer an opinion “on whether they were improper in any sense, either legal or ethical.”

 

Halligan’s Signal messages to the reporter were configured to automatically disappear after eight hours, The Post reported.

The judge did not address whether Halligan’s communications — which reportedly disputed a New York Times story revealing that James’ grandniece told a grand jury she had never paid rent on the Norfolk, Va., property at the center of the case — constituted material subject to discovery requirements.

 

James pleaded not guilty last week to one count of bank fraud and one count of making a false statement to a financial institution.

Adam Schiff’s Career OBLITERATED: Kash Patel Unleashes Classified Hell, Exposes Corruption, Lies, and Foreign Ties LIVE on TV

 

Washington’s Most Brutal Political Takedown: How Kash Patel Nuked Adam Schiff’s Reputation and Changed American Politics Forever

In the cutthroat world of Capitol Hill, political theater is a daily routine. But on one crisp autumn morning, the Senate Judiciary Committee chamber became the stage for a massacre that would go down as the most devastating political takedown in modern American history. Adam Schiff, the self-anointed guardian of truth, swaggered into the hearing, ready to humiliate FBI Director Kash Patel. By the end, Schiff’s career lay in ruins, eviscerated by a decorated combat veteran wielding classified evidence like a sledgehammer.

 

The room buzzed with anticipation as cam

cameras zeroed in, expecting the usual grandstanding. Schiff, master of media manipulation, had orchestrated the moment for weeks. Friendly outlets had already drafted headlines accusing Patel of Kremlin ties. Schiff’s plan? Call the FBI Director a Russian agent on live TV, trigger a media feeding frenzy, and cement his legacy as the man who “saved democracy.” What happened next was a nuclear-level backfire.

 

FBI Director Kash Patel entered the chamber with the calm of a man who’d stared down terrorists, not Twitter mobs. His credentials weren’t built on campaign cash or cocktail parties—they were forged in the fires of national security. Prosecutor. Defense official. Intelligence officer. Combat veteran. Patel didn’t need to prove his patriotism; he’d lived it.

 

Schiff arrived last, flashing his trademark smirk, the kind that had gotten him through a thousand cable news segments. When his turn came, he ditched any pretense of discussing FBI reforms. He leaned forward, eyes blazing, and dropped his bomb:

 

“Director Patel, before we discuss reforms, we must address the elephant in the room. The American people deserve to know their FBI director has concerning ties to the Kremlin.”

A gasp rippled through the chamber. Republican senators objected. Schiff doubled down, waving his “evidence” like a death sentence. “I believe you are a Kremlin agent working against American interests.” The media sharks smelled blood. Phones lit up. The viral moment was here.

 

Patel didn’t flinch. He didn’t stammer. He didn’t blink. He sat still, eyes locked on Schiff, the same look he’d given Al-Qaeda operatives in interrogation rooms. Then, with surgical precision, Patel opened his briefcase and laid five folders on the table, each marked with classification stamps that made staffers squirm.

 

“Senator Schiff,” Patel said, voice like steel, “since you’ve chosen to abandon the hearing’s purpose and attack my patriotism, perhaps we should instead discuss your fraudulent mortgage applications, fabricated Russia collusion claims, Ukraine whistleblower coordination, classified intelligence leaks, and undisclosed foreign financial connections.”

 

The room froze. Schiff’s smirk evaporated. The blood drained from his face. Patel held a royal flush and everyone knew it.

He opened the first folder: Financial Fraud—Classified.
“Shall we begin with your five fraudulent Fannie Mae mortgage applications, or would you prefer we start with the recording of you admitting you had no actual evidence of Russian collusion despite your public claims?”

 

Schiff tried to object, but the chairman waved him off. Patel was in control now.

Patel unleashed a tsunami of evidence:

Five primary residence mortgages claimed simultaneously, each a federal crime.

 

Loan applications, tax filings, GPS data showing Schiff’s real whereabouts.
$1.4 million in preferential mortgage rates, $1.7 million saved through wire fraud.
Surveillance footage of Schiff partying at his beach house while claiming to live in Maryland.

 

Emails plotting to block affordable housing near his luxury properties.
A $38 million real estate portfolio on a $174,000 salary. Mathematical impossibility.

“While ordinary Americans lost homes, you committed systematic mortgage fraud,” Patel spat, his voice cutting through the chamber like a buzzsaw.

 

Schiff’s face contorted. “This is an outrageous violation of privacy!”
“These are federal crimes, Senator,” Patel replied. “18 U.S. Code, up to 30 years in prison.”

The evidence was overwhelming. Then Patel dropped the hammer:

 

“You used fraudulently obtained funds to invest in luxury developments that opposed affordable housing. You weaponized your office for personal gain while your constituents suffered.”

The audience was stunned. But Patel was just warming up.

He opened the second folder: Russia Collusion Fabrication—Classified.
For three years, Schiff had told America he had “direct evidence” of Trump-Russia collusion. Patel played tape after tape of Schiff’s TV appearances, each more damning than the last. But then came the kill shot:
Audio recordings of Schiff privately admitting “the actual intelligence doesn’t get us there on collusion, but perception is reality. We need to keep pushing the narrative, even if the Mueller investigation comes up empty.”

Five authenticated recordings.
Internal emails showing Schiff received intelligence assessments stating “insufficient evidence to establish coordination,” yet went on TV claiming the opposite.

“This isn’t political disagreement,” Patel said. “It’s deliberate deception. You divided this nation with lies you knew were false.”

Schiff tried to protest, but Patel played more tapes, more emails, more timelines. The chamber was silent, except for the sound of careers imploding.

Next came the third folder: Ukraine Whistleblower Coordination—Classified.
Patel revealed emails, meeting logs, and text messages showing Schiff’s staff coached the Ukraine whistleblower weeks before the complaint was filed.
“Focus on quid pro quo angle,” they wrote. “Emphasize national security.”
Yet Schiff went on TV claiming, “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.” Patel played the video, then the emails. The contradiction was irrefutable.

“This wasn’t a misstatement,” Patel said. “It was calculated deceit.”

Fourth folder: Classified Intelligence Leaks—Counterintelligence Assessment.
Patel displayed a timeline linking 42 classified leaks to Schiff’s office.
Bank records showing $4.7 million in consulting fees, book advances, and speaking honoraria flowing to Schiff after major leaks.
One leak aborted a hostage rescue, resulting in death and trauma.
Patel’s voice broke for the first time. “When you leak intelligence for personal gain, you’re not just breaking the law. You’re putting American lives at risk.”

The room was beyond shocked. Even Schiff’s Democratic allies shrank away.

Final folder: Foreign Financial Connections—Counterintelligence Assessment.
Patel exposed a web of shell companies, Chinese state-owned enterprises, and foreign-linked funding vehicles channeling $7.2 million to organizations tied to Schiff.
Surveillance footage, bank records, and legislative timelines showed Schiff’s votes shifting to benefit foreign interests after the money flowed.
Recorded conversations with Chinese liaisons confirmed quid pro quo arrangements.

“Senator, you’ve built your career accusing others of foreign influence,” Patel said. “But the evidence suggests you’ve maintained your own network of foreign financial relationships, deliberately structured to evade disclosure.”

For two hours, Patel eviscerated Schiff with evidence, not rhetoric. The committee was stunned. Veterans in the gallery stood in silent respect. Schiff slumped in his chair, isolated and defeated.

Within hours, the media landscape shifted. “Schiff Exposed” trended worldwide. The Senate Ethics Committee suspended Schiff and launched investigations. The DOJ appointed a special counsel. Fannie Mae froze accounts. The evidence was too damning to ignore.

Patel didn’t celebrate. He returned to the FBI, told his team, “No one, regardless of position or party, should be above accountability.” He implemented the most sweeping reforms in FBI history. Public trust soared. The “Patel Standard” became the new benchmark for accountability.

Schiff resigned within a year, facing federal indictments. His network of staffers and associates turned state’s witness. The era of weaponized accusations was over. In its place, a new principle: evidence, not rhetoric, determines truth.

As Patel reflected in his only interview, “True patriotism sometimes requires difficult choices. The American people deserve leaders whose public commitments match their private actions.”

The day Adam Schiff tried to humiliate Kash Patel became the day America discovered the truth. The systematic exposure of mortgage fraud, fabricated Russia claims, whistleblower coaching, intelligence leaks, and foreign financial ties didn’t just end a career—it changed the game. For too long, politicians weaponized accusations while hiding their own corruption. Patel’s revelation shattered that paradigm.

America’s political landscape will never be the same. Accountability is back. The truth still matters. And the era of untouchable politicians is over.

Share this story before they try to memory-hole what really happened. This is just the tip of the iceberg. God bless our veterans. God bless the patriots who choose truth over politics. And God bless everyone who still believes America is worth fighting for.

 

 

Continue reading