8.MOMENT GOP Congress Man Eli Crane TOTALLY DESTROY Democrat Governor Tim Walz Using His Own Words
MOMENT GOP Congress Man Eli Crane TOTALLY DESTROY Democrat Governor Tim Walz Using His Own Words
The Rhetoric vs. Reality: Governor Walz’s Congressional Roasting
The recent congressional hearing was a masterclass in political confrontation, featuring GOP Congressman
Eli Crane absolutely torching Democrat Governor Tim Walz on a variety of issues, ranging from immigration policy to incendiary rhetoric. Crane didn’t just ask questions; he delivered an execution via the Governor’s own words, showcasing a perceived disconnect between Walz’s statements and the hard realities of his state’s policies.
The Immigration Inconsistencies: “Why Are You Lying?”
The exchange began with a direct challenge to the Governor’s opening statement, where Walz claimed that “nothing Minnesota has done stands in the way of federal government managing its border security policy.” Crane immediately called him out, asking,
“Why are you lying to this committee?”
The core of Crane’s attack was the public stance of Minnesota’s Attorney General, Keith Ellison, the state’s top law enforcement official. Crane submitted an article stating that AG Ellison “will not enforce federal immigration laws,” even as the DOJ threatens prosecution for officials who resist. Walz’s defense—claiming state law requires officials to ask for immigration status of convicted felons—was swiftly dismissed by Crane as a misrepresentation, insisting that the AG’s public defiance stands as a clear contradiction to the Governor’s assurance of non-interference.
Crane then moved to the argument that Minnesota’s policies actively create a border magnet, citing a list of state benefits: free healthcare, food assistance, free college tuition, driver’s licenses, and cash assistance.
In Crane’s judgment, these policies are not “helping” border security but are rather creating an irresistible incentive, effectively making Minnesota a “sanctuary state” in practice, regardless of official designation.
The Toxic Messaging: ICE and the “Gustapo”
The scrutiny intensified as Crane addressed the Governor’s rhetoric, particularly Walz’s past characterization of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)
agents.
Crane grilled Walz on his decision to call federal law enforcement agents
“modern-day Gustapo,” a deeply offensive historical parallel. Crane challenged the Governor directly: “You think that calling them Gustapo is helping?” Walz attempted to pivot to a defense of “due process” and “best practice in law enforcement,” but Crane hammered the point that such inflammatory language from a state executive actively hurts the federal government’s ability to carry out its mandated enforcement.
Further damaging the Governor’s credibility was an unverified quote where Walz allegedly told Anderson Cooper, regarding the border wall, “If it’s 25 ft, then I’ll invest in a 30-foot ladder factory.” Walz claimed not to remember the comment, which Crane seized upon as evidence of “so many outlandish things that you can’t even keep track of them.”
The Radical Agenda and Electoral Damage
Crane saved his most powerful and judgmental rebuke for the end, focusing on what he labeled Walz’s “radical left-wing agenda.”
He dismissed Walz’s previous podcast boast that he scares MAGA voters “because they know I can fix a truck” and could “kick most of their asses,” countering that the fear stems purely from his policies.
Crane’s list of “radical” policies included:
Supporting tampons in boys’ bathrooms.
Advocating for disarming Americans of their Second Amendment rights.
Being pro-sanctuary city.
Claiming there is “no guarantee to free speech”
when it comes to misinformation and hate speech—a view Crane acidly suggested Walz may have picked up during one of his alleged trips to “communist China.”
Finally, Crane weaponized Walz’s political aspirations against him, referencing a quote where Walz allegedly said Kamala Harris picked him for Vice President to “code talk to white guys.” Crane closed the interrogation with a decisive blow, stating Walz
“lost by 22 points to white guys” and promising: “If you want to continue that rhetoric, go on, brother. Keep doing it. We’ll keep destroying you in election.“
The entire spectacle, as the transcript concludes, was a decisive, one-sided clash where Congressman Crane used facts, undeniable quotes, and logic to demonstrate, in his judgment, the severe consequences of Governor Walz’s radical ideology and inflammatory rhetoric.
Hochul Pumps The Brakes On Mamdani’s $700 Million Free Bus Plan
The wheels are coming off the socialist bus.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul is tapping the brakes on Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s $700 million plan for free city buses, casting early doubt on one of the far-left lawmaker’s biggest campaign promises, The New York Post reported.
Speaking at the SOMOS political retreat in Puerto Rico on Saturday, Hochul said she’s already spent heavily to support the city’s struggling MTA and questioned how much further the state could go.
“I continue to be excited at the work of making the slowest buses in America fast and free,” Mamdani said Monday during an unrelated press conference. “And I appreciate the governor’s continued partnership in delivering on that agenda of affordability.”
But Hochul’s comments in San Juan marked the latest break between the moderate Democratic governor and Mamdani, the Democratic socialist she endorsed just two months ago.
Hochul happily rode Mamdani’s coattails during the campaign as he energized progressives with promises of affordability and social programs, but she has shown far less enthusiasm for actually paying for them.
The governor has rejected several of Mamdani’s cornerstone ideas, including proposals to raise taxes on wealthy New Yorkers to fund $10 billion in new benefits like free child care and fareless transit.
Her caution could create a serious roadblock for the incoming mayor, whose ambitious plans rely on support from Albany to move forward.
The top two Democratic leaders in the state Legislature — Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins — have signaled more willingness to help Mamdani pursue his agenda.
That divide leaves Hochul increasingly isolated from the party’s energized left flank, which has been openly pressuring her to embrace higher taxes on the rich.
During recent public appearances, activists have twice interrupted the governor with chants of “Tax the rich,” drawing a sharp rebuke.
“The more you push me, the more I’m not going to do what you want,” Hochul told the SOMOS crowd in response.
Still, Hochul did not fully reject Mamdani’s wish list.
She said she’s open to working with him on expanding free child care, though she made clear it would be an expensive and long-term goal.
“We’ll be on a path to get there, because I’m committed to this as ‘mom governor’ — I get it,” Hochul said.
“But also to do it statewide, right now, it’s about $15 billion — the entire amount of my reserves.”
The cautious tone was a reality check for Mamdani, who has portrayed himself as the champion of “everyday New Yorkers” and promised to make the city more affordable through massive new public spending.
Hochul’s remarks also came as she continues her own political maneuvering ahead of a likely 2026 re-election bid.
After the SOMOS conference, she flew to the Dominican Republic to attend a breakfast celebrating cross-cultural exchange — an event seen as an appeal to one of New York’s largest and most influential immigrant voting blocs.
Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers trace family roots to the Dominican Republic, making the outreach a politically savvy move for a governor seeking to rebuild her base while keeping the party’s left wing at arm’s length.
Whether Hochul and Mamdani can maintain their uneasy alliance may determine not only the future of free buses and child care, but also the balance of power within the New York Democratic Party.
No Longer a Secret! Prince Andrew Reveals the TRUTH About Prince Harry’s Son Archie After 3 Years Hidden: ‘I Have Discovered Archie’s Real Father, and It Turns Out to Be…’” 👇👇👇
In a rare move, Prince Andrew has made public remarks concerning Prince Harry’s son, drawing wide attention from both the public and international media.
An Unexpected Statement
According to
Buckingham Palace sources, Prince Andrew expressed particular concern for Harry’s children, especially Archie. He emphasized the importance of preserving family bonds at a time when the Royal Family is undergoing significant change.
“Despite the distance, we are still a family. Archie, and all the younger ones, deserve to grow up surrounded by love, unity, and a true sense of belonging,” he said.
A Message to Harry and Meghan
Prince Andrew’s words are seen as a gesture of reconciliation toward Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who stepped back from royal duties in 2020. He stressed that children should not be affected by tensions or disagreements among adults and expressed hope that the Royal Family could find common ground to maintain a sense of connection.
Public Reactions
The remarks quickly sparked divided reactions. Some praised the Duke’s statement as compassionate, highlighting his focus on the younger generation of the Royal Family. Others, however, voiced skepticism, suggesting it may be an attempt to improve his personal image after a series of controversies.
Significance for the Royal Family
Royal commentators observed that while Andrew’s comments are unlikely to resolve the current rift between Prince Harry and the rest of the family, they may signal a willingness to open dialogue and work toward reconciliation. At a time when stability is seen as essential for the monarchy’s future, gestures that emphasize family unity carry particular weight.
